Scroll the sidebar to vote in The Punch Die's new poll: Is History an art or a science?

Friday, February 29, 2008

Priceless!

This is just priceless:



Oh, and here's the new creepy video from the flailing Hillary Clinton campaign:





Perhaps the creepiest thing about this ad is the person, presumably the mother, checking in on the sleeping children at 3am...wearing a business suit!

Technorati Tags: ,

Thursday, February 28, 2008

Septimius Severus and More Imperial Propaganda



Here's another masterstroke of Roman imperial propaganda. This tiny, nicely toned silver denarius of Septimius Severus shows a laureate portrait of Septimius on the front with the legend L SEPT SEV PERT AVG IMP VII on the obverse, while the reverse shows Victory advancing left holding a wreath and trophy. The reverse legend reads ARAB ADIAB COS II PP. Reference is RIC 64 and RSC 50.

Arab and Adiab are abbreviations for the titles Arabicus and Adiabenicus, awarded for military victories over the Scenite Arabs and Adiabenians, two vassal peoples of the Parthian king. In 194 AD, after he had mopped up Pescennius Niger and his forces in the east, Septimius undertook a punitive expedition against the Arabs and Adiabenians. Septimius had good reason for an expedition beyond the frontier, as many of Niger's supporters had fled there. In addition, to giving aid to Niger, the Scenite Arabs and Adiabenians had launched an attack on the marcher city of Nisibis, which at the time may have even had a Roman garrison there.

However, this coin type, as well as another type featuring two captives seated back-to-back and bound, refers not solely to Septimius's victories over the Scenite Arabs and Adiabenians in 194 AD and three additional victories over them in 195 AD for which he claimed the titles Imperator V, VI, and VII. The types, more importantly, refer to the victory over Pescennius Niger. In order to obscure the fact that what Septimius was really advertising and celebrating was a victory in a civil war – and thus the shedding of Roman-on-Roman blood – Septimius emphasized the victory as being over the Arabs and Adiabenians.

De-emphasizing a victory over other Romans by emphasizing a victory and celebrating a triumph over their foreign allies indeed had a precedent, as in 46 BC Julius Caesar celebrated his African triumph over Juba, instead of those who were his real opponents there – the Pompeian forces.

Technorati Tags: , ,

Saturday, February 23, 2008

Uncleaned Coins Arrive

That was quick, despite hopefully checking my mail box every day after work for the past six days. Now it's off to boil the coins...

Technorati Tags:

Tuesday, February 19, 2008

The Battle of Lyons, 19 February 197 AD



Today is the anniversary of the battle of Lyons, fought in 197 AD between the forces of Septimius Severus and his erstwhile and precarious ally Clodius Albinus. Septimius had already defeated Didius Julianus in Rome and Pescennius Niger in the East; at Lyons, Septimius was victorious gained definitive mastery of the Roman world.

The battle may very well have been the largest and bloodiest battle ever fought by Roman forces - that's saying a lot since Roman armies frequently fought each other. Dio claims 300,000 soldiers fought - 150,000 on each side - and while that's surely an exaggeration, it's possible that the total Roman forces reached 100,000 troops.

Septimius celebrated his victory over Albinus with - what else - games, and commemorated the event with the above denarius type. The obverse features a laureate portrait of Septimus facing right with the legend L SEPT SEV PERT AVG IMP VIIII. The reverse features an elephant walking right with the legend MVNIFICENTIA AVG. It is from the Rome mint and is 18mm in diameter and weighs 2.92 g. The reference is RIC 100.


Technorati Tags: , , , ,

Monday, February 18, 2008

Thoughts on the Meaning of President's Day

I wrote this last year, but it's obviously still relevant...

Today's Washington Post editorializes on the meaning of President’s Day, arguing that the real importance of the holiday rests with the observation of the birthdays of George Washington (Feb 22) and Abraham Lincoln (Feb 12). I'm not one to quibble with recognition of the brilliance of these two great men. And I agree with some of the editorials other points, namely, the economic impetus of the "President's Day" tag. But I think it takes a rather narrow view of what we should be taking away from President's Day – the celebration of the office of the President, the celebration of our country and its history. I think there is real importance is celebrating all of our country's presidents, "good" or "bad." As the most visible and recognizable representation of the freedom, justice, liberty, and hope that the United States embodies in the minds of its citizens, the office of the President of the United States of America is a powerful symbol of our country and is in and of itself worthy or our respect with a holiday dedicated to it.

On a separate, but related topic, last Friday the New York Times editorialized on the new presidential coinage, and managed to politicize even that, complete with the obligatory liberal stab at President Bush:


But there is real educational value in including every president. At a time when the current occupant of the White House thinks presidential powers should be expanded to new extremes, the series will be a four-times-a-year reminder that not everyone who makes it to the White House belongs on Mount Rushmore.


But what the NY Times fails to understand is that, like President’s Day, the presidential coinage is an appropriate celebration of the office of the President of the United States of America. The paper itself implies this when it says "The decision to make a line of presidential coins was a natural one, and once made, it would be hard to pick and choose." I don't think that anyone would say the tenures of Millard Fillmore, Franklin Pierce, or James Buchanan should be individually acclaimed the same way those of Washington, Lincoln, and Jackson are. But the totality of the new coinage represents not individual achievements, but the achievements of the office in sum.

***

It's interesting to note that whereas the NY Times editorial goes out of its way to criticize President Bush as one who thinks presidential powers should be expanded to new extremes (in a time of existential threat to the U.S., mind you), the Post editorial cites Lincoln's expansion of presidential powers in the time of the greatest existential threat to the U.S., as a large part of his greatness.

***

What's your opinion? Let me know who your top five presidents are. Mine are—and I oscillate on this; the current list is: 1) Lincoln; 2) Washington; 3) T. Roosevelt; 4) Reagan; 5) FDR.

UPDATE: The American Thinker discusses the three worst presidents.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , ,

Sunday, February 17, 2008

Military History Carnival #11

The 11th Military History Carnival is up, hosted this month by Battlefield Biker. The theme is the "people, weapons, and places of war."

Technorati Tags:

I Ordered Some Uncleaned Coins

I ordered some uncleaned coins yesterday, on a whim. I said in the second post on this blog that my collecting strategy was to buy single, very nice specimens, of silver denarii and antoniniani. I complained that one will never amass a high grade collection buying uncleaned coins. The majority of these are late Roman bronzes, and the overwhelming majority of those are common Constantinian issues.

Yet I have to admit, I'm really excited to get to clean these coins. It's an added bonus to the already fascinating hobby of Roman coin collecting to be actually able to clean and conserve your own specimens, even if they are common Constantinian bronzes (for the record, I ordered some coins "guaranteed" to be either Valentinian, Valens, or Gratian, as well as some Roman provincials - which should tell you these are probably not deeply encrusted coins.) I won't post here from whom I bought the coins until I receive them and clean them, so I'll be in a position to either praise or condemn. What is certain, though, is I'll be using one of the best "How-To" guides to clean my coins...

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Saturday, February 16, 2008

A Billon Antoninianus of Gallienus

Even someone with a superficial knowledge of Roman history knows that the third century was not a pleasant time for the empire. In fact, during most of the century, the empire stood at the brink of oblivion. The Crisis of the Third Century, as this series of hardships is generally known as, was caused by external strife, as Sasanian Persia rose to a legitimate rival superpower in the East and Germanic tribes invaded the West; internal civil war as general after general squabbled for central control at the expense of the frontiers; and economic calamity. By 260 AD, the provinces of Britain, Gaul, and Hispania in the West broke from central control, as did Syria, Palestine, and Egypt in the East. Indeed, 260 AD marks perhaps the lowest point in the Roman Empire’s history, as in that year the emperor Valerian was taken prisoner by the Sasanians and was rumored to be used as the Sasanian king Shapur I’s stepping stool for 10 years before he was flayed alive and his skin was used as a palace decoration.

Valerian's son Publius Licinius Egnatius Gallienus (r. 253-268 AD) was his co-emperor, serving from 254 AD as administrator of the western half of the empire. He was the sole Augustus of the empire after his father’s humiliating capture and, after news of that defeat spread, Gallienus had the unenviable task of dealing with inevitable consequences: the Germans stepped up their incursions into Roman territory, Roman troops revolted and governors acclaimed themselves as emperor, and the aforementioned provinces broke away in rebellious offshoots.


It is largely through the efforts of emperors such as Gallienus (and later Claudius Gothicus and Aurelian) that the empire did not descend into total anarchy. Despite the dire situation, Gallienus was actually quite energetic in exercising his imperial authority and rising to meet the myriad challenges of his reign. He created a new rapidly deployable strategic cavalry corps which would rival the Praetorian Guard and portend future reorganization of the Roman army (this force is commemorated on his coinage with reverse type legend CONCORD EQVIT.) He met, and crushed, several rebellions out of Pannonia and Moesia. Gallienus recognized Odenathus of Palmyra in the East as a de facto governor, bringing stability to Syria, while he himself went on to deal with Postumus, the rebel governor of the so-called Gallic Empire. He twice inflicted serious defeats upon the Gallic usurper. He was unable to secure the return of the Gallic Empire to the Roman center when in 267 AD he was forced to deal with a massive Germanic incursion into Greece. In 268 AD, Gallienus met the largest Germanic force ever assembled to that date at the battle of Naissus. The Romans were victorious, slaughtering nearly 50,000 Germans. The victory was not total, however, for as soon as he defeated the Germans, Gallienus had to deal with the revolt of his cavalry commander Aureolus. Despite his energetic defense of the empire, Gallienus went the way most Roman emperors of the third century did: assassination at the hands of his own troops.

The inflation that had plagued Rome since the reign of Septimius Severus had gotten much, much worse during Gallienus's reign. The already debased silver coins were debased further as precious metals were scarcer and scarcer, yet there was an even greater need to produce more coins to pay the soldiers. Because of this, more and more coins were struck, meaning the coins of Gallienus are usually abundant in the modern market. As his reign was a time of turmoil, his coinage depicts some fine Roman propaganda themes. The protection of the emperor was one such theme, as Gallienus issued a series of coins that honored deities as Conservator Augusti, including Apollo, Diana, Hercules, Jupiter, Juno, Liber Pater, Mercury, Neptune, and Sol. Sometimes the reverses depict animals that represent the attributes of the deity. For example, Hercules is represented by either the lion or the boar. The series was issued probably to both secure the protection from these said gods, but also to commemorate games (like his Decennalia in 262 AD) meant to divert the citizens' attention from all that plagued the empire.

The coinage of Gallienus is both plentiful and varied in reverse types, making the series an interesting area for new collectors. Gallienus reigned during a chaotic time, but his victories were many, and this is evident in his coinage. The above coin is a billon antoninianus 22.1mm in diameter and weighing 3.5g. It features a radiate, draped and cuirassed bust of Gallienus facing right on the obverse with the legend IMP C P LIC GALLIENUS AVG. Look closing at the obverse image, there's a small dot beneath the bust - RIC makes no mention of this dot. The reverse features Victory standing right handing palm and handing wreath to the emperor standing opposite. The reverse legend reads VICTORIA AVG. The coin was struck 255/256 AD at the Asia mint. What's really interesting about this coin is that it dates from, and is in the style of, the joint reign of Valerian and Gallienus. Yet the reverse legend VICTORIA AVG indicates only one emperor. It should read VICTORIA AVGG to indicate more than one Augustus. We know that Gallienus sought to forge his own imperial personality after his father was captured by the Persians. Perhaps this coin suggests he did this even during his father's lifetime.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Tuesday, February 12, 2008

Results of the Greatest Roman Emperor Poll (and Debate Causes of Western Empire's Fall)

I've finally closed the "Greatest Roman Emperor" poll after nearly a month and a half. Here are the results:

Augustus: 15 (29%)
Trajan: 10 (20%)
Constantine: 9 (18%)
M. Aurelius: 7 (14%)
Vespasian: 3 (6%)
Hadrian: 3 (6%)
S. Severus: 1 (2%)
Diocletian: 1 (2%)
Antoninus Pius: 1 (2%)
Aurelian: 1 (2%)

My personal top three would have been Augustus, Trajan, and Vespasian. In the end, I think you've got to go with Augustus. He's not only one of the greatest emperors of Rome, but he's also one of the greatest figures of history. His absolute power actually made him better rather than corrupting him. I think Augustus overshadows them all and Rome was uniquely lucky that Augustus (Octavian) emerged when and how he did. After Augustus, I think Trajan is the greatest Roman emperor. He took over from Nerva and ushered in an unparalleled period of peace and prosperity and extended the boundaries of the Roman world to their largest extent. He also did much to the city of Rome - his extensive building projects reshaped the eternal city.

I'm probably most surprised at the fact that Vespasian garnered only 3 votes. After the excesses of the Julio-Claudians, including the fourteen year debacle of Nero's reign and the tumultuous Year of the Four Emperors, Vespasian's austere, practical, and smart rule saved the empire from financial disaster and brought much needed stability Rome.

Aurelian is perhaps the least well-known emperor on this list, but I nevertheless feel he deserves more props for at least hanging on during some of the empires absolute darkest days. During his reign, the breakaway so-called Palmyrene and Gallic Empires were reunited with Rome.

I suspect that the majority who voted for Constantine did so because of his role in the development of Christianity. That, and attributing to him some achievements that really should be attributed to his predecessor, Diocletian.

As for Marcus Aurelius, who finished in fourth place (much higher than I would have rated him), how many of you, like me, would penalize him for securing the succession of his crazy natural son Commodus?

Thanks to everyone who voted and commented in the poll. Please scroll the sidebar for The Punch Die's new poll, What was the most important cause of the fall of the Western Roman Empire? Please use the comments section of this post (also in the sidebar) to debate your choice.

Technorati Tags: , ,

Monday, February 11, 2008

Roman Jokes

Mary Beard talks about what made the Romans laugh. I love Roman wit, especially Cicero's Second Philippic against Antony and Pro Milone, his defense of Milo for murdering his hated enemy Clodius.

But my favorite Roman jokes are the ones Caesar's veterans told of his sexual exploits. They warned Romans to "lock up their wives" because with them came "the bald-headed adulterer." Caesar was known in his own time as a profound womanizer, but homosexual rumors also dogged him. In his Gallic triumph his veterans chanted a verse celebrating the gossip that Caesar got a little too close with Nicomedes the king of Bithynia, during his time there:

Caesar subdued Gaul - but Nicomedes subdued Caesar:
Behold now Caesar triumphs, who has conquered Gaul -
Nicomedes does not triumph, although he conquered Caesar.

I'm sure it sounded better in Latin:

Gallias Caesar subegit Nicomedes Caesarem:
Ecce Caesar nunc triumphat qui subegit Gallias
Nicomedes non triumphat qui subegit Caesarem.

This particular jest so annoyed Caesar that he actually took a public oath denying it. According to Cassius Dio, all this did was make him look ridiculous. Some things never change, as Idaho senator Larry Craig unfortunately found out this summer: nothing says "I'm gay" like a public declaration that you're not gay.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , ,

Wednesday, February 6, 2008

Septimius Severus Legionary Type: Legio IIII Flavia


If, like me, you are interested in Roman emperors of military significance, then you must, at some point, engulf yourself in the history of the reign of Septimius Severus (193-211 AD). Though Septimius's reign brought a degree of stability to the empire after the tumultuous reign of Commodus and the subsequent debacles of Pertinax and Didius Julianus, his eighteen years on the throne in most respects transformed Rome into a military dictatorship and is often seen as a bridge between the peace and prosperity of the era of the "Five Good Emperors" and the chaos and crisis of the mid and later third century. "The contemporaries of Severus, in the enjoyment of the peace and and glory of his reign, forgave the cruelties by which it had been introduced," wrote Edward Gibbon. Perhaps no Roman emperor before or since owed their accession to the purprle through military might more so than Septimius. He remarkably defeated three separate claimants to the throne - Didius Julianus in Rome and Pescennius Niger in the East in 193 AD and then Clodius Albinus in Gaul in 195-197 AD.

Upon the death of Pertinax and the purchase of the empire by Didius Julianus in 193 AD, Septimius, the governor of Pannonia, was proclaimed emperor by his troops and accumulated the support of sixteen legions along the Rhine, Danube, and Dacian frontiers. This denarius is part of a special coinage series from the Rome mint in 193 AD that celebrated the sixteen legions that supported Septimius's bid for the throne against Didius Julianus. This particular coin honors legio IIII Flavia. Created by Vespasian in 70 AD, in 193 AD the legion was stationed at Singidunum (modern Belgrade) in the province of Moesia Superior. The legion remained loyal to Septimius through the war with Pescennius Niger, as well as through the later war with Clodius Albinus.

In the long run, Septimius's monetary policy – "Give the soldiers money and despise everyone else," as Dio sums it up – did the most harm to the empire, as he and his successors were forced to debase the silver coinage to dangerous levels and his pay raises to the troops unquestionably led to more money in circulation. Some of this was not entirely Septimius's fault. It cannot have been easy to raise funds – to pay donatives to the troops as well as prepare for a war in the East against Niger – after both Pertinax and Didius Julianus had paid large donatives to the soldiers. The legionary series of coinage, therefore, was probably struck to pay donatives to Septimius's troops. In fact, shortly after the military expedition left Rome for the war against Niger, the Severan forces mutinied over the choice of camp, less than ten miles north of the city. It was apparently quelled without incident, perhaps through distribution of the new legionary coinage.

This coin's beauty doesn't completely come across in the scan, but it is truly a great specimen for the type and for this particular legion. The obverse features a laureate portrait of Septimius facing right with the legend IMP CAE L SEP SEV PERT AVG. The reverse features a legionary eagle flanked by two standards with the legend LEG IIII FL / TR P COS. The coin is 16.5 mm in diameter with a weight of 3.46g. Reference is RIC 8.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Monday, February 4, 2008

Poor Richard the Lionheart!

This simply amazes me:

Britons are losing their grasp on reality, according to a poll out Monday, which showed that nearly a quarter think Winston Churchill was a myth while the majority reckon Sherlock Holmes was real.

The survey found that 47 percent thought the 12th century English King Richard the Lionheart was a myth.

And 23 percent thought World War II prime minister Winston Churchill was made up. The same percentage thought Crimean War nurse Florence Nightingale did not actually exist.

Though one would think it inexplicable that nearly half of the British population does not think Richard I was a real person, I can somewhat understand how Richard - one of the most enigmatic kings in England's history - could be thought of as a myth. Richard's reputation has suffered the most extreme swings of assessment. For long after Richard's reign, he was seen as the greatest of English kings, being compared favorably to King Arthur, Alexander the Great, Augustus, and Charlemagne. But, since about the eighteenth century, Richard's reputation has been trashed. David Hume and Edward Gibbon both thought he was a terrible ruler. Bishop Stubbs called Richard "a bad son, a bad husband, a selfish ruler and a vicious man." More recently, J.A. Brundage has called Richard one of England's worst kings. J.J. Norwich similarly labeled the Lionheart. Sames goes for Regan.

In his own lifetime Richard's reputation suffered a massive propaganda campaign by the regime of Philip II of France. Ironically, for the most objective and detached assessment of Richard the Lionheart, one probably should consult the contemporary Muslim writers of the Third Crusade.

As for Churchill, well, we may soon be lucky Brits have even heard of the name...

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , ,

Sunday, February 3, 2008

The Glory of the Army

This is a Gloria Exercitus AE 3 of Constantius II (Caesar 324-337 AD; Augustus 337-361 AD). It was a popular issue of the Constantinian Dynasty, struck by Constantine, Constans, Constantine II, Constantius II, Delmatius, and in City commemoratives of the fourth century. Though the Gloria Exercitus coins come in myriad variations, there are two basic reverse types: two Roman soldiers standing either side of two standards, and two Roman soldiers standing either side of one standard; both have the reverse legend GLORIA EXERCITVS. These myriad variations make this somewhat boring coin a fairly popular item among those collectors who obsess over getting every possible variation of a single type of coin. As you can see, this coin is of the latter basic reverse type, from the time Constantius II was Caesar. The obverse features a laureate and cuirassed bust of Constantius facing right with the legend FL IVL CONSTANTIVS NOB C. On the reverse, in the exergue, rSIS indicates that the coin was struck at the Siscia mint. (RIC VIII 86)



Gloria Exercitus means "The Glory of the Army." More specifically, it's a reference to the Roman infantry. Roman coins were always used to distribute propaganda, especially to the military and it is obvious from this reverse type what the Constantinian family was trying to say and do. After all, though Constantine I is known as "the Great" and the dynasty he founded brought a measure of stability to the empire, it was, in essence, a military dictatorship. Though I'm not really enamoured by the coinage of the late Roman empire, I do find fascinating the propaganda served by the reverse types of the fourth and fifth century. As I've said earlier, optimistic reverse types like the Gloria Romanorum series masked some serious problems going on in the Roman empire.

Technorati Tags: ,

Friday, February 1, 2008

Happy Birthday, Rome


According to tradition, Rome was founded in 753 BC. In the year 248 AD, the city of Rome celebrated its 1,000th birthday. The emperor at the time was Philip I, who's reign, other than being known as that of "the Arab," was noteworthy for little other than Rome's anniversary. This silver antoninianus is part of a series of coinage Philip issued to mark the anniversary. The reverse legend, SAECVLARES AVGG, refers to the declaration of the Saeculum, which was to mark the city's tenth saeculum cycle and first millenium. (Obverse: radiate portrait of Philip facing right, with legend IMP PHILIPPVS AVG.) Of course, this celebration came complete with Saecular games, with thousands of exotic animals slaughtered. While the above coin's reverse shows a cippus (sort of like an ancient Roman billboard) displaying COS III, the rest of Philip's saecular coinage illustrates several exotic animals that were used in the anniversary games.

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,